"(of course there is also another way of looking at this: the freeze is a simple role change. For an instant, we are privileged to look through the camera– as though we hand't been looking through it all the time– and see the film creww making a pause for a pose)"
In our situation who changes roles? What kind of – if any– heirachy is there? I would say that we as performers need to operate/co-exist or deprive ourselves in order for the (any) meaning to become activated- that IT poses rather than us. Like the photo of the light/reflection/camera (all simoultaneously working) obscuring my face. This could be how to approach the appointment, a flash of light that obscures?
I'm not quite able to articulate it yet, but I think this freezing to a pose in film is similar to how we are disrupting the archive- we interrupt its normativised mode of performance, deprive it, and thus create a possible contingency.
In this book, by Pavel, which is sometimes less interesting he says earlier...
"it tells us how imagination, the power to make something out of nothing, can be manipulated to unite us collectively in a vision of reality which otherwise conflicts with individual perceptions and consciousness"
But as mentioned in passing before, perhaps we ought to rather make this as an imagined scenario, in a poster or discussion than actual performance?