
Would we use the setup in the auditorium of the Jan van Eyck as a blueprint for the exhibition in the Bonnefanten as a kind of physical evidence of the situation in which the B-masterclass and our B-Blueprint was presented? As traces of actions taken place?
Since some time now we have been introducing spaces to each other. By speaking about them, visiting (sharing experience in) them choreographing a performance in them.
Let's say that Gallery 4 dimensions' are 6.50 x 10 m. The setup of the auditorium would take up quite some part of the total size. What are the qualities we'd like to convey (with it)? Certainly it'll look awkward and institutional. If we're not allowed to borrow the tables from the JVE or if it is somehow better to imitate the setup with slightly different furniture, like the tables from the Hoffman catalogue, what kind of qualities should those tables ideally have? Flexible/ collapsible/ new/ smaller then real size..?
Could you post the 'abstract' that I borrowed from you on the blog, if you still think we can do something with it. I find the text interesting and totally ridiculous. It mixes up and creates a big knot of words: embodied passion, demotivation, work behavior management / motivation management, emotional situations, expressive/emotional processes, emotional realities, embodied passion, passionate processes -of the organization, it's members and workers.